The first company to stand trial under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 has been fined £385,000 after being found guilty by the jury at Winchester Crown Court.
The conviction of Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings Ltd came after a two-week trial at the court, where the company answered charges by the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to the death of employee
Alexander Wright in September 2008.
In handing down the sentence on 17 February, the judge, Mr Justice Field, confirmed the company could pay the fine over a 10-year period, with £38,500 due every year of that period. The company does not have to pay any costs.
The judge said the fine marked the gravity of the crime and the deterrent effect it would have on companies to adhere to health and safety guidance. He said a larger fine would cause the small scale company to be liquidated, and four people would lose their jobs. “It may well be that the fine in the terms of its payment will put this company into liquidation. If that is the case it’s unfortunate but unavoidable but it’s a consequence of the serious breach,” he said.
Mr Wright, 27, had been left working alone in a 3.5m-deep trench to ‘finish up’ after the managing director of Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings, Peter Eaton, left for the day. A short time later, the trench collapsed on Mr Wright and buried him.
Peter Eaton had originally been charged with manslaughter by gross negligence, as well as a health and safety offence, in his own capacity but these charges were dropped after a successful application by his defence team last October on the grounds of his poor health. The company also originally faced a separate health and safety offence, but this was dropped by the prosecution in January this year after the judge raised the issue of whether the two different burdens of proof for the two remaining charges might confuse a jury.
In convicting the company, the jury found that the company’s system of work in digging trial pits was wholly and unnecessarily dangerous. The court heard the company ignored industry guidance.
Detective Inspector Giulia Marogna, of Gloucestershire Constabulary, who investigated the case with the support of the HSE, described Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings’ approach to health and safety as “cavalier”, and the way it taught and supervised its junior engineers as “inherently dangerous”.
Some commentators have argued that the Act was not designed to prosecute small businesses like Cotswold. However, the case was seen as a test case for the legislation. To secure the conviction,
the prosecution needed to demonstrate that:
• Cotswold’s conduct caused the employee’s death and amounted to a gross breach of a relevant
duty of care owed to the employee (section 1(1)).
• A substantial element of the breach was in the way the organisation’s senior management managed
or organised its activities (section 1(3)).
The successful prosecution of Cotswold demonstrates the importance for businesses to have a
health and safety culture and to ensure that everyone takes responsibility for improving health and
safety.If you've found this post interesting please share it with your online community using either the Twitter, Facebook or Share buttons below.